Future Threats of Terrorism Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Future Threats of Terrorism - Assignment Example The article uses the words non-traditional violence for terrorism as per his analysis, traditional violence is different. The article lacks clear description of violence and also the writer is unable to define traditional and non-traditional violence in an elaborative manner. The article brings migration as a problem to increase violence in many countries and negates other factors that add to the changing nature of violence other than migration. The whole article seems to explain that in future, we are going to see many non-traditional and disastrous kinds of violence, however, what can be these kinds of violence, the article gives no idea. Article 2: This article elaborates the idea that Al Qaeda as a group that regards itself intelligent strategist and mindful planner is in fact becoming threat for itself because it is defeating itself. The writer informs that Al Qaeda being a strong group as it claims to be, is unable to accomplish its set mission that was to take Muslims with them because many innocent Muslims were killed and harmed by Al Qaeda itself due to which, Muslims regard them as their enemies. However, the article seems restricted and an explanatory account of Al Qaeda’s doings and real life examples are not given in the article. In addition, the writer thinks that killing of Osama Bin Laden will make the group fighting for a leaderless Jihad; however, one man’s killing will give rise to other leaders to come in the forefront and become new leaders. According to the writer, Al Qaeda is endangering itself by attacking people disregarding their creed. Article 3: Picarelli describes the theories of Hoffman and Sageman in this article describing the future of terrorism in the world. As per Hoffman, Al Qaida is the sole threat to the world, however as per Sageman’s analysis, the threat has shifted from Al Qaida to new groups operative in Europe and United States. According to the writer, the reason for

Is Capitalism a Hindrance to Democracy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Is Capitalism a Hindrance to Democracy - Essay Example Before making an argument on this issue, it is necessary to fully understand the terms involved. Democracy is typically used interchangeably with the form of government more properly known as a republic. Because true citizenship democracies have rarely ever existed, representative democracies have co-opted the term despite lacking key factors. For the purpose of argument, this paper will use as a definition of democracy that which is agreed upon by the authors of The Politics of Power: A democracy is a system based on popular participation by its citizens, representative government and a commitment to equality in the ability of citizens to influence policies directly affecting their lives (Katznelson, Kesselman and Draper 2006, p. 8). Capitalism is typically defined as an economic sy... The nuances of capitalism that affect the course of democracy revolve around the power of capital itself. If it is accepted that part of the definition of democracy includes representative governors elected by the people, then a question immediately must be raised. Who are these representatives and how are they elected In the current American system, the pool of those eligible for election is becoming increasingly smaller. The reason has to do with the cost of getting elected. As the cost of a candidacy increases, so does the power of those who can contribute the most to these candidates. ARGUMENT Corruption is an unavoidable component of any political or economic system. There is no such thing as a universally viable economic system that is inherently corrupt. Capitalism and socialism could both theoretically work without the taint of corruption. The reason that neither ever has is due to the human factor. Human beings have needs that require currency and sometimes the easiest way to acquire that extra currency is through corrupt practices. While no economic system is in itself corrupt, they all contain practices which promote corruption. The fact that capitalism has led democracy in the United States to the point where only a select few can ever dream of being elected to positions of power is not proof that the economic system is a hindrance to the political system. After all, there is no evidence to suggest that simply because someone has the economic basis to get elected that he will not then act in the best interests of those whom he is representing. What is far more disturbing is how the electoral process mirrors the governmental process. The ability to get